Emilian Eva, prosecutor of the Court leave, professional grade Prosecutor’s Office High Court of Cassation and Justice, is suspected of financial transactions as trade acts incompatible with the purpose of obtaining for himself money, goods or other undue advantages and false statements regarding the wealth statements relating to works of art.
Prosecutors from the National Anticorruption Directorate – (Department for Combating Corruption ) ordered detention for 24 hours, from 09 July 2015 16.55 o’clock, until 10 July 2015, at 16.55, EVA EMILIAN the defendant, prosecutor within Iasi Tribunal Prosecutor’s Office regarding the criminal offenses of:
- Money laundering
- Conducting financial transactions as trade acts incompatible with the purpose of obtaining for himself money, goods or other undue advantages,
In order prosecutors it shows that in this case, data and evidence that outlines the following facts:
During the months of May-June 2014, during which his relative was hospitalized Eva Emilian defendant asked a doctor to do its best work “to be good for everyone”, meaning to grant treatment skilled person hospitalized.
Following this request, on 16 June 2014 ordered the defendant Eva Emilian ranking by order of a criminal case or waiver of prosecution, to the doctor respectively investigated for committing the crime of bribery, fraud, abusive behavior , forgery, use of forgery.The solution was arrangedat intervals four days after the relevant file allocation prosecutor Eva Emilian.
After the favorable settlement of this case, between August 2014 – March 2015 Eva Emilian defendant requested and received from the doctor that various goods and undue benefits as consideration for favorable solution adopted.
During the same period, the defendant claimed Emilian Eva and received from the doctor that a painting at an undervalued price, for which he paid the sum of 1,000 lei 2,000 lei instead, as it was market value. Subsequently, the aforementioned range, Emilian Eva defendant requested and received from the same person, free of charge, two paintings.
On 12 January 2015 the defendant through an intermediary obtained from the Ministry of Culture – Directorate for Culture Iasi, a permanent certificated and sent to the United Kingdom a total of three paintings, to be exploited by means of auction houses on the territory of the state mentioned above, one of the paintings being claimed and received as bribe.
Between August 2014 and June 2015, the defendant Eva Emilian traded or brokered trading of more than 200 paintings, with a market value of about 300,000 euros, although the quality of magistrate is incompatible with carrying out acts of commerce. Specifically, between November 2014 – April 2015, the defendant Eva Emilian purchased from various individuals, a total of 94 paintings, some signed by Romanian and foreign artists best rated art market in Romania, which, directly or through intermediaries, he left them in custody for evaluation at an auction house in Bucharest , of
which a total of 16 paintings were valued at a total of 81,600 euros.
In January – February 2015, the defendant Eva Emilian posted through intermediaries, for sale, on an advertising site to 34 paintings allegedly signed or executed by famous painters, requesting a total of 51,800 euros.
Between August 2014 – June 2015, the defendant purchased or led negotiations for the purchase of various individuals or art galleries, asked evaluations from people with expertise, restored, using various painters / restorers, and has used or attempted to capitalize on a number of about 97 paintings. Of these, 12 paintings were judged by the defendant Eva Emilian and other intermediaries, the amounts of 84,500 euros, 95,000 pounds and 7,500 lei.
The analysis of the 2015 declaration of assets given on oath, it appeared that the defendant Eva Emilian made untruthful statements in this letter which are in total contradiction to the facts described above. At issue is conducted criminal prosecution and to others. At issue supported by specialized prosecutors from the Romanian Intelligence Service.
Eva defendant was made aware Emilian standing and charges, in accordance with Art.309 Code of Criminal Procedure, to be presented on 10 July 2015, the High Court of Cassation and Justice, the proposal of preventive arrest for 30 days.
We specify that the initiation of criminal action represents a stage of the criminal proceedings regulated by the Criminal Procedure Code, aimed at creating the procedural administration of evidence, any activity which can not, under any circumstances, infringe the principle of presumption of innocence.