The Judge Viorel Munteanu from Romania , is part of a group of interests more powerful than justice

He condemned a person in a case, although evidences that the person is innocent. hat in Romania, don’t believe that in Romania, the state institutions may do these abuses . Evidence and documents in the file have led us to make investigations regarding this case.

Bacau Court

The case number is 19435/180/2011 and was tried at the Court Bacau , Romania . In this folder have been obscure interests from the beginning. Group of interests of which he is a member and that judge, has done everything possible to condemn the accused person: intimidation, abuses, falsification of judiciary acts. In the file there are judicial expertise. These technical evidence show that the evidence on which it has used prosecutor have been counterfeit. However, the judge refused these samples without to give reasons for why they had not accepted. During the investigations we will show that this judge had  obscure interests judgment on this case. These obscure interests demonstrates that it is part of the network headed by a former prosecutor DIICOT.

We will present solid evidence supporting what we write. And other publications from Romania have written about this network, but state institutions refused to take what measures are required in these cases . It is obvious that Romania is overcome by the power Justice Mafia to these countries.

 In this case , Viorel Munteanu to pronounce in case that prosecutor and over 5 years he has decided that judge. State institutions protects such magistrates and promoting in the largest functions once again, Romania demonstrates that it is capable to protecting the abuses and corruption of a system , called justice. The citizens of Romania does not have the chance to be part of an process of open and honest. Interest groups from the Romanian judiciary have come to have a very large force. This force dark do not respect fundamental human rights and dominated by force citizens of Romania.

THE JUDGE, VIOREL MUNTEANU

THE JUDGE, VIOREL MUNTEANU OF ROMANIA , GIVES SOLUTIONS IN THE FILES, AFTER PERSONAL INTERESTS

 Judge, Viorel MunteanuThe Judge , Viorel Munteanu is a very controversial judge. This judge, to promote on “occult” ways, he favored an important company petroleum in a criminal case . It is the case No. 628/260/2012 from Moinesti Court.

In December 2010 a house in the village Zemes, Bacau County exploded. One of the victims suffered burns of grades 3 and 4 on 30% of his body. A day after the explosion were evacuated other six families. It was agreed that gas wells would have been the source of the explosion (and attorney have supported this).

Oil wells belonging to SC OMV Petrom SA – THE LARGEST OIL COMPANY IN SOUTH EAST OF EUROPE . Oil company refused a deal on the grounds that it would create a precedent. Area manager of the company, Mr. Constantin Constantinescu, informed victims that they have no chance in court because SC OMV Petrom is too strong . He was right. DESPITE THE FACT THAT prosecutors have PROVEN the company guilty , the judge Viorel Munteanu acquitted oil company .

The purpose ? : Obtaining promotion. After only one month after the verdict, was promoted.

The explosion of the Zemes According to sources from the system, the judge Viorel Munteanu has repeatedly requested from the Court Moinesti where there had been appointed by decree in 2012. In January and March 2013, the Superior Council of Magistracy , does not allow transfer of the magistrate at the Roman Court or Bacau Court. But after the oil company declared not guilty in this case (Although many people have been hurt), the Superior Council of Magistracy (CSM) it promotes on judge Viorel Munteanu at the Court Bacau. Surprisingly? Not necessarily. As long as he’s worked for Bacau Court has been recruited by the interest group headed by a former prosecutor DIICOT Bacau. Colleagues in the judicial system from Romaniain, would be protected by the special services. However, sources within the DNA have confirmed that Judge has some complaint lodged to DNA (The National Anticorruption Directorate) on his name and DNA started checking them.

It’s been almost 3 years after the explosion and victims fight for justice and now .

In the following investigations, we will present other files in which this judge has destroyed independent justice principles and transparency trial

FORGERY IN OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS AT A PROSECUTOR FROM ROMANIA

       This journalistic investigation lasted two months. In this investigation we not encountered obstacles, pressures or intimidation from institutions in Romania. The persons who provided information to journalists from CARJ they wanted to remain under the protection of journalistic sources. The people which provided information in this investigation will be protected as journalistic sources. This is the first investigation with regard to this magistrate.

Prosecutor Dimitriu Radu

          Dimitriu Radu, is a controversial prosecutor within DIICOT Romania (Directorate for Investigating Organized Crime and Terrorism ). With a profile very speckled by abuses and irregularities (according to the judicial sources from Romania), he declared false information in official documents that belong to it, in order to hide certain amounts of money coming from banks of the country.

FALSE IN OFFICIAL STATEMENTS IN 2008

       Based on the documents of the Superior Council of Magistracy of Romania, (CSM) but also from other institutions, CARJ has been found that the prosecutor DIMITRIU RADU HE DID FALSE IN OFFICIAL STATEMENTS.

In the statement of revenue from 2008 is mentioned only a loan from 2007 taken from Transilvania Bank of 65.600 RON. But in the declaration in 2009, the prosecutor mentions 2 new loans, both taken in the year 2007. Both taken from Romanian Bank in the amount of 130.000 Euro. In these circumstances, the prosecutor had made false in statements official because not mentioning in statement of wealth from 2008 all the Bank loans taken in 2007 from Romanian Bank.

Statement_of_Wealth_2008_Dimitriu_RaduStatement_of_Wealth_2009_Dimitriu_Radu

FALSE IN OFFICIAL STATEMENTS IN 2010

In 2010, the prosecutor Dimitriu Radu make a new false in statements. Thus, in his declaration of wealth in 2009, the prosecutor shall record the credit of 65.600 RON which it has taken in 2007 from Transilvania Bank. The contract had maturities in 2012. In the statement of wealth from 2010 The prosecutor Dimitriu Radu, do not write this credit. In the Declaration of wealth in 2011 appears again the credit in value of 65.600 RON on which it took him in 2007 from Transilvania Bank. If this credit has not been paid before the deadline, it is obvious that the prosecutor Dimitriu Radu has made false in the declaration in 2010, because had refused to pass to revenue the credit in worth of 65.600 on which it has taken in 2007 from Transilvania Bank.

 Statement_of_Wealth_2010_Dimitriu_Radu

Statement_of_Wealth_2011__Dimitriu_Radu

ACCORDING TO SOURCES FROM TRANSILVANIA BANK, THE CREDITS PROSECUTOR HAVE BEEN ” FORCED “

Persons from Transilvania Bank, they said that the situation of credits made by customer Dimitriu Radu, have a substratum of suspicion. the conditions for obtaining these loans were “forced”. Mr. Dimitriu Radu, did not have very high income to be able to get in the same time a large number of credits. (especially during the 2007-2008). It is obvious that the conditions for obtaining these credits were “forced” by his wife, who works in a branch of our bank.

PROTECTED BY STATE INSTITUTIONS

CARJ investigation is made in the year 2014. This journalistic investigation has brought to the surface, forgeries of the Prosecutor Dimitriu Radu from the years 2008-2010. The Institutions from Romania they knew about this situation, since 2011.

However, all judicial institutions from Romania have refused researching this prosecutor for false in official statements.

In these circumstances, we understand that certain structures of the Romanian justice system (as DIICOT), benefit from the protection of the state institutions, and people of these structures have the “freedom” to do what they want.