Posted on July 11, 2015 ,
Emilian Eva, prosecutor of the Court leave, professional grade Prosecutor’s Office High Court of Cassation and Justice, is suspected of financial transactions as trade acts incompatible with the purpose of obtaining for himself money, goods or other undue advantages and false statements regarding the wealth statements relating to works of art.
Prosecutors from the National Anticorruption Directorate – (Department for Combating Corruption ) ordered detention for 24 hours, from 09 July 2015 16.55 o’clock, until 10 July 2015, at 16.55, EVA EMILIAN the defendant, prosecutor within Iasi Tribunal Prosecutor’s Office regarding the criminal offenses of:
- Money laundering
- Conducting financial transactions as trade acts incompatible with the purpose of obtaining for himself money, goods or other undue advantages,
In order prosecutors it shows that in this case, data and evidence that outlines the following facts:
During the months of May-June 2014, during which his relative was hospitalized Eva Emilian defendant asked a doctor to do its best work “to be good for everyone”, meaning to grant treatment skilled person hospitalized.
Following this request, on 16 June 2014 ordered the defendant Eva Emilian ranking by order of a criminal case or waiver of prosecution, to the doctor respectively investigated for committing the crime of bribery, fraud, abusive behavior , forgery, use of forgery.The solution was arrangedat intervals four days after the relevant file allocation prosecutor Eva Emilian.
After the favorable settlement of this case, between August 2014 – March 2015 Eva Emilian defendant requested and received from the doctor that various goods and undue benefits as consideration for favorable solution adopted.
During the same period, the defendant claimed Emilian Eva and received from the doctor that a painting at an undervalued price, for which he paid the sum of 1,000 lei 2,000 lei instead, as it was market value. Subsequently, the aforementioned range, Emilian Eva defendant requested and received from the same person, free of charge, two paintings.
On 12 January 2015 the defendant through an intermediary obtained from the Ministry of Culture – Directorate for Culture Iasi, a permanent certificated and sent to the United Kingdom a total of three paintings, to be exploited by means of auction houses on the territory of the state mentioned above, one of the paintings being claimed and received as bribe.
Between August 2014 and June 2015, the defendant Eva Emilian traded or brokered trading of more than 200 paintings, with a market value of about 300,000 euros, although the quality of magistrate is incompatible with carrying out acts of commerce. Specifically, between November 2014 – April 2015, the defendant Eva Emilian purchased from various individuals, a total of 94 paintings, some signed by Romanian and foreign artists best rated art market in Romania, which, directly or through intermediaries, he left them in custody for evaluation at an auction house in Bucharest , of
which a total of 16 paintings were valued at a total of 81,600 euros.
In January – February 2015, the defendant Eva Emilian posted through intermediaries, for sale, on an advertising site to 34 paintings allegedly signed or executed by famous painters, requesting a total of 51,800 euros.
Between August 2014 – June 2015, the defendant purchased or led negotiations for the purchase of various individuals or art galleries, asked evaluations from people with expertise, restored, using various painters / restorers, and has used or attempted to capitalize on a number of about 97 paintings. Of these, 12 paintings were judged by the defendant Eva Emilian and other intermediaries, the amounts of 84,500 euros, 95,000 pounds and 7,500 lei.
The analysis of the 2015 declaration of assets given on oath, it appeared that the defendant Eva Emilian made untruthful statements in this letter which are in total contradiction to the facts described above. At issue is conducted criminal prosecution and to others. At issue supported by specialized prosecutors from the Romanian Intelligence Service.
Eva defendant was made aware Emilian standing and charges, in accordance with Art.309 Code of Criminal Procedure, to be presented on 10 July 2015, the High Court of Cassation and Justice, the proposal of preventive arrest for 30 days.
We specify that the initiation of criminal action represents a stage of the criminal proceedings regulated by the Criminal Procedure Code, aimed at creating the procedural administration of evidence, any activity which can not, under any circumstances, infringe the principle of presumption of innocence.
Posted on June 4, 2015 ,
In the same file, Ionel Tudose, prosecutor at DIOCT – Central Structure is prosecuted for complicity in extortion.
According to a release of DNA in the period July 2012 – September 2013 Marius Radu Vlădoianu claimed by a person (denouncer concerned) money totaling 7,000 euros and a commission of 20% of the value of land or 20% of the disputed land surface to court to exercise influence over judges in Dolj, so that the denouncer to obtain a favorable judgment in a civil case on restoration of property rights, under appeal, and, on the other hand in order to facilitate enforcement.
The relationship between the prosecutor and denouncing Vlădoianu was brokered in the period July 2002 – April 2013, another person who claimed and received for Vlădoianu money for him from denouncing.
Later in the period June 2014 – February 2015, to obtain an amount of money needed to cover the damage determined by the tax authorities (over 1 million RON) in a case that concerned a company in which his wife Vlădoianu prosecutor and a liaison person had interest Vlădoianu pressured the Syrian business people who have a contractual relationship with that company, to enable them to bear that loss.
The prosecutor Vlădoianu compelled Syrian businessmen to enter into a contract of sale for a property at a price overvalued, covering damage and ensure a profit for himself and liaison person.
In this regard, it addressed Vlădoianu Syrians threats that will be opened a criminal case on their behalf DIICOT Bucharest.
Syrian businessmen were also contacted by the person’s trust Vlădoianu, he addressed threats and filed a criminal complaint, but which was not registered in the records DIICOT by Ionel Tudosan prosecutor.
However, in February, Syrian businessmen were summoned to the prosecutor DICOT Bucharest Tudosan without it to be empowered to solve any cause that to regard them. Moreover, the prosecutor Tudosan criminal proceedings are conducted without being concerned DIICOT role.
Posted on April 26 , 2015
Prosecutors DNA – Section for fighting corruption sent to trial, remand, Constantin Balaban, senior prosecutor of the Prosecutor’s Office near Macin Court, at the material time for performing financial transactions as trade acts incompatible function to obtain for himself money, goods or other undue advantages, false statements, repeated acts (7 material acts) and bribery (three offenses).
There have also been brought to justice, in liberty, Regep-Uta Aslan, Marian Cherry, Teodor Viorel Sava Liviu Amet, for bribery, and Valentin Jugănaru, complicity in bribery.
According to the indictment prepared by prosecutors DNA, in February 2015 Constantin Balaban, the chief prosecutor of the Court Prosecutor’s Office attached Macin received from two individuals, through intermediary as a bribe, a 70 kg calf after slaughter, about 200 euro in exchange for favorable settlement of a criminal case in which they were investigated for injury.
Also, Constantin Balaban is accused in August-September 2014 received from another person, through an intermediary, within the Prosecutor’s Office near Macin Court successively, the amounts of 550 euros and 700 lei. In exchange for the bribes, Balaban has agreed with the establishment of a favorable solution in a criminal case that person was prosecuted for driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol. Thus, at the initiative of the investigated person, he drew up a plea agreement by which the person received the sentence of one year in prison, with the postponement of enforcement.
Anti-corruption prosecutors have detained in the indictment that between 23 July 2007 – March 4, 2015, Balaban managed a company that was the sole shareholder and administrator of his wife, the effect was directly involved in managing commercial relationships with other companies. On August 16, 2007, following the establishment and operationalization of that company, he credited her as an individual, with the amount of 244,000 lei and 16 July 2012, with the amount of 4,200 lei. However, on July 23, 2007- 2 March 2009 and 1 November 2011, Constantin Balaban, through the administrator, credited the same company with a total of 375,000 lei.( about 10.000 euro)
These loans are not found mentioned in the declarations of wealth produced, as a prosecutor for the years 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and there are no data that would have revealed that these claims were extinguished by the repayment of loans by the company. Furthermore, within these statements, under “Revenue” he passed prosecutor salary and the salary of his wife, without there being any mention of the company in question, although his wife, scripting, act as the administrator and sole, and society He had a turnover for the years 2012-2014 in the amount of 1,066,368 lei. (about 25.000 of euro) .
Mass Media : detention prosecutor in the Romanian language